With everything else going on — the likely imminent demise of Roe v. Wade, the revelation that Donald Trump knew he had tested positive
for the coronavirus before he debated Joe Biden, and more — I don’t
know how many readers are aware that the U.S. government was almost
forced to shut down this weekend. A last-minute deal averted that
crisis, but another crisis is a couple of weeks away: The government is
expected to hit its debt ceiling
in the middle of this month, and failure to raise the ceiling would
wreak havoc not just with governance but with America’s financial
reputation.
The thing is, the federal government isn’t having any problem raising money — in fact, it can borrow at interest rates
well below the inflation rate, so that the real cost of servicing
additional federal debt is actually negative. Instead, this is all about
politics. Both continuing government funding and raising the debt limit
are subject to the filibuster, and many Republican senators won’t
support doing either unless Democrats meet their demands.
And
what has Republicans so exercised that they’re willing to endanger both
the functioning of our government and the nation’s financial stability?
Whatever they may say, they aren’t taking a stand on principle — or at
least, not on any principle other than the proposition that even duly
elected Democrats have no legitimate right to govern.
In some ways we’ve seen this movie before. Republicans led by Newt Gingrich
partly shut down the government in 1995-96 in an attempt to extract
concessions from President Bill Clinton. G.O.P. legislators created a series of funding crises
under President Barack Obama, again in a (partly successful) attempt to
extract policy concessions. Creating budget crises whenever a Democrat
sits in the White House has become standard Republican operating
procedure.
Yet current G.O.P. attempts at extortion are both more naked and less rational than what happened during the Obama years.
Under
Obama, leading Republicans claimed that their fiscal brinkmanship was
motivated by concerns about budget deficits. Some of us argued even at
the time that self-proclaimed deficit hawks were phonies, that they didn’t actually care about government debt — a view validated by their silence when the Trump administration blew up the deficit
— and that they actually wanted to see the economy suffer on Obama’s
watch. But they maintained enough of a veneer of responsibility to fool
many commentators.
This time,
Republican obstructionists aren’t even pretending to care about red ink.
Instead, they’re threatening to shut everything down unless the Biden
administration abandons its efforts to fight the coronavirus with vaccine mandates.
What’s
that about? As many observers have pointed out, claims that opposition
to vaccine mandates (and similar opposition to mask mandates) is about
maintaining personal freedom don’t stand up to any kind of scrutiny. No
reasonable definition of freedom includes the right to endanger other
people’s health and lives because you don’t feel like taking basic
precautions.
Furthermore, actions by
Republican-controlled state governments, for example in Florida and
Texas, show a party that isn’t so much pro-freedom as it is pro-Covid.
How else can you explain attempts to prevent privatebusinesses
— whose freedom to choose was supposed to be sacrosanct — from
requiring that their workers be vaccinated, or offers of special unemployment benefits for the unvaccinated?
In
other words, the G.O.P. doesn’t look like a party trying to defend
liberty; it looks like a party trying to block any effective response to
a deadly disease. Why is it doing this?
To
some extent it surely reflects a coldly cynical political calculation.
Voters tend to blame whichever party holds the White House for anything
bad that happens on its watch, which creates an incentive for a
sufficiently ruthless party to engage in outright sabotage. Sure enough,
Republicans who fought all efforts to contain the coronavirus are now attacking the Biden administration for failing to end the pandemic.
But trying to shut down the government to block vaccinations seems like overreach, even for hardened cynics. It’s notable that Mitch McConnell, whom nobody could accuse of being a do-gooder, isn’t part of the anti-vaccine caucus.
What seems to be happening instead goes beyond cold calculation. As I’ve pointed out
in the past, Republican politicians now act like apparatchiks in an
authoritarian regime, competing to take ever more extreme positions as a
way to demonstrate their loyalty to the cause — and to The Leader.
Catering to anti-vaccine hysteria, doing all they can to keep the
pandemic going, has become something Republicans do to remain in good
standing within the party.
The result
is that one of America’s two major political parties isn’t just refusing
to help the nation deal with its problems; it’s actively working to
make the country ungovernable.
And I hope the rest of us haven’t lost the ability to be properly horrified at this spectacle.
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment